Analytic & Ordinary Language Philosophy in Dialogue: Max Deutsch & Avner Baz on the ‘Method of Cases’

Inquiry recently published a paper by Max Deutsch responding to Avner Baz’s ordinary language critique of mainstream analytic philosophy. The journal then invited Baz to reply to Deutsch’s paper. Their full exchange (see links below) will be of interest to OLP&Lit readers eager to understand what’s at stake in between analytic and ordinary language philosophy.

The relevant citations are as follows:

  1. “Must Philosopher Rely on Intuitions?” (Journal of Philosophy, 2012)
  2. “Recent Attempts to Defend the Method of Cases, and the Linguistic (Re)turn” (forthcoming in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research): http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/phpr.12106/abstract
  3. Deutsch’s criticism of Baz’s argument (Inquiry, September 2015): “Avner Baz on the ‘Point’ of a Question”http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0020174X.2015.1083467
  4. Baz’s reply to Deutsch (Inquiry, November 2015): “Questioning the Method of Cases Fundamentally”http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0020174X.2015.1109178?journalCode=sinq20

Happy reading!

CL

 

2 thoughts on “Analytic & Ordinary Language Philosophy in Dialogue: Max Deutsch & Avner Baz on the ‘Method of Cases’

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s